After one more word of preliminary explanation we shall be ready to discuss the formal definition of tensor products. It turns out to be technically preferable to get at
Definition 1. The tensor product
This definition is one of the quickest rigorous approaches to the theory, but it does lead to some unpleasant technical complications later. Whatever its disadvantages, however, we observe that it obviously has the two desired properties: it is clear, namely, that dimension is multiplicative (see Section: Bilinear forms , Theorem 2, and Section: Dual bases , Theorem 2), and it is clear that
Another possible (and deservedly popular) definition of tensor product is by formal products. According to that definition
For the present we prove only one theorem about tensor products. The theorem is a further justification of the product terminology, and, incidentally, it is a sharpening of the assertion that dimension is multiplicative.
Theorem 1. If
Proof. Let
EXERCISES
Exercise 1. If
Exercise 2. Let
Exercise 3. To what extent is the formation of tensor products commutative and associative? What about the distributive law
Exercise 4. If
Exercise 5.
- Suppose that
is a finite-dimensional real vector space, and let be the set of all complex numbers regarded as a (two-dimensional) real vector space. Form the tensor product . Prove that there is a way of defining products of complex numbers with elements of so that whenever and are in and is in . - Prove that with respect to vector addition, and with respect to complex scalar multiplication as defined in (a), the space
is a complex vector space. - Find the dimension of the complex vector space
in terms of the dimension of the real vector space . - Prove that the vector space
is isomorphic to a subspace in (when the latter is regarded as a real vector space).
The moral of this exercise is that not only can every complex vector space be regarded as a real vector space, but, in a certain sense, the converse is true. The complex vector space
Exercise 6. If