Polar decomposition

There is another useful consequence of the theory of square roots, namely, the analogue of the polar representation ζ = ρ e i θ of a complex number.

Theorem 1. If A is an arbitrary linear transformation on a finite-dimensional inner product space, then there is a (uniquely determined) positive transformation P , and there is an isometry U , such that A = U P . If A is invertible, then U also is uniquely determined by A .

Proof. Although it is not logically necessary to do so, we shall first give the proof in case A is invertible; the general proof is an obvious modification of this special one, and the special proof gives greater insight into the geometric structure of the transformation A .

Since the transformation A A is positive, we may find its (unique) positive square root, P = A A . We write V = P A 1 ; since V A = P , the theorem will be proved if we can prove that V is an isometry, for then we may write U = V 1 . Since V = ( A 1 ) P = ( A ) 1 P , we see that V V = ( A ) 1 P P A 1 = ( A ) 1 A A A 1 = 1 , so that V is an isometry, and we are done.

To prove uniqueness we observe that U P = U 0 P 0 implies P U = P 0 U 0 and therefore P 2 = P U U P = P 0 U 0 U 0 P 0 = P 0 2 . Since the positive transformation P 2 = P 0 2 has only one positive square root, it follows that P = P 0 . (In this part of the proof we did not use the invertibility of A .) If A is invertible, then so is P (since P = U 1 A ), and from this we obtain (multiplying the relation U P = U 0 P 0 on the right by P 1 = P 0 1 ) that U = U 0 .

We turn now to the general case, where we do not assume that A is invertible. We form P exactly the same way as above, so that P 2 = A A , and then we observe that for every vector x we have \begin{align} \|P x\|^{2} &= (P x, P x)\\ &= (P^{2} x, x)\\ &= (A^{*} A x, x)\\ &= \|A x\|^{2}. \end{align}If for each vector y = P x in the range ( P ) of P we write U y = A x , then the transformation U is length-preserving wherever it is defined. We must show that U is unambiguously determined, that is, that P x 1 = P x 2 implies A x 1 = A x 2 . This is true since P ( x 1 x 2 ) = 0 is equivalent to P ( x 1 x 2 ) = 0 and this latter condition implies A ( x 1 x 2 ) = 0 . The range of the transformation U , defined so far on the subspace ( P ) only, is ( A ) . Since U is linear, ( A ) and ( P ) have the same dimension, and therefore ( ( A ) ) and ( ( P ) ) have the same dimension. If we define U on ( ( P ) ) to be any linear and isometric transformation of ( ( P ) ) onto ( ( A ) ) , then U , thereby determined on all 𝒱 , is an isometry with the property that U P x = A x for all x . This completes the proof. ◻

Applying the theorem just proved to A in place of A , and then taking adjoints, we obtain also the dual fact that every A may be written in the form A = P U with an isometric U and a positive P . In contrast with the Cartesian decomposition ( Section: Self-adjoint transformations ), we call the representation A = U P a polar decomposition of A .

In terms of polar decompositions we obtain a new characterization of normality.

Theorem 2. If A = U P is a polar decomposition of the linear transformation A , then a necessary and sufficient condition that A be normal is that P U = U P .

Proof. Since U is not necessarily uniquely determined by A , the statement is to be interpreted as follows: if A is normal, then P commutes with every U , and if P commutes with some U , then A is normal. Since A A = U P 2 U = U P 2 U 1 and A A = P 2 , it is clear that A is normal if and only if U commutes with P 2 . Since, however, P 2 is a function of P and vice versa P is a function of P 2 ( P = P 2 ), it follows that commuting with P 2 is equivalent to commuting with P . ◻

EXERCISES

Exercise 1. If a linear transformation on a finite-dimensional inner product space has only one polar decomposition, then it is invertible.

Exercise 2. Use the functional calculus to derive the polar decomposition of a normal operator.

Exercise 3. 

  1. If A is an arbitrary linear transformation on a finite-dimensional inner product space, then there is a partial isometry U , and there is a positive transformation P , such that 𝒩 ( U ) = 𝒩 ( P ) and such that A = U P . The transformations U and P are uniquely determined by these conditions.
  2. The transformation A is normal if and only if the transformations U and P described in (a) commute with each other.