2.3.1 Differentiability
So far we have dealt with concepts which are more or less obviously generalizations of the elementary notions of real analysis. Our ultimate goal, the development of the differential and integral calculus of complex functions, rests upon the notion of complex derivative and this, as we shall see, leads to definitely new insights.
A complex function
A function
We are especially interested in functions which possess a derivative at every point of a domain
The rules for differentiation of analytic functions are formally the same as for real functions, the proofs carrying over in exact analogy. The derivative of the sum of two analytic functions exists and is the sum of their derivatives,
To this point the theory of complex functions runs a close parallel to that of real functions. A function
But this is actually the point of departure. The differentiability of
Let
Let us now investigate what the differentiability of
Theorem 2.4 . A necessary and sufficient condition that a complex function
Proof. The proof of sufficiency is simple. We may write
As an example of an analytic function take
Although formally the same, the definition of derivative for complex functions leads to a far more restricted class of functions than the differentiable functions of a real variable. From the behavior of a real function in one part of its domain of definition nothing can be said about its behavior elsewhere. On the other hand, as we shall see, the local behavior of an analytic function is intimately related with its behavior in the entire domain of its definition. First we shall establish what is perhaps the most remarkable result of the theory – the fact that the derivative of an analytic function is in turn differentiable and hence that any analytic function is indefinitely differentiable.
2.3.2 Remarks and Examples, Harmonic Functions
Let us consider a number of examples of analytic functions. Take
Another important example is the function
The function
Clearly
Very generally, we have already seen ( here ) that a power series
In analogy to theorems of the real calculus we have the following results:
Theorem 2.5 . If
This is a direct consequence of the Cauchy-Riemann equations for if
If
Theorem 2.6 . If
Proof. We have by the Cauchy-Riemann equation
But the theorems of the differential calculus give no more than this result. Since the Jacobian
2.3.2.1 Harmonic functions
How much latitude does one actually have in fixing the real and imaginary parts of an analytic function? Once we specify the real part